I have in the past mentioned how important presuppositions
are in scripture interpretation. Here is a comparison and contrast of the
presuppositions of evangelical dogma in relation to the presuppositions of my
paradigm shift. I think that there is good biblical evidence for my
presuppositions. I also think that the presuppositions of evangelical dogma are
not really that biblical, and in large part are responsible for all of the
disagreement that exists within evangelical ranks.
Evangelical
Presuppositions
|
Paradigm
Shift Presuppositions
|
The Bible is the word of God
|
Under the Mosaic Covenant the Torah was the word of God. Jesus and
his first century followers changed that to refer to the gospel, and Jesus
the living gospel
|
The Bible is a legal-constitutional document
|
Under the Mosaic Covenant, the Tanakh (commonly known as the Old
Testament) was a legal-constitutional document. Under the New Covenant, to
the new creation, the scripture is the story of redemption and has a strictly
redemptive salvific purpose. This too was taught by Jesus and his first
century followers.
|
Eschatology is a future phenomenon.
|
The first century followers of Jesus saw eschatology as a first
century phenomenon. They along with the first century Jews were expecting the
end of the age and the beginning of the Age to Come, Olam Ha Ba in Hebrew
|
Jesus’ references to Gehenna was geared toward eternal torturous punishment
|
Jesus’ reference to Gehenna was geared toward the upcoming
destruction of the temple, and the judgment of the first century Jews that
rejected him as Messiah.
|
The New Testament is all directed at the church of Christ.
|
The New Testament document is a transitional document that moves from
John the Baptist the last Mosaic Covenant Prophet, to Jesus the fulfillment
of the Prophet, Priest, and King, whose earthly mission was strictly to the
Jews, to Pentecost and a strictly Jewish church, to Cornelius and the
inclusion of the Gentiles, to the apostle Paul who wrote to the one new man,
the new creation. While this view is nuanced it is important in understanding
the purpose of the scripture.
|
The Sermon on the Mount is the law of Christ.
|
The Sermon on the Mount was an amplification of the law of Moses
showing the impossibility of gaining righteousness by living the law.
|
The transformation comes from believing the gospel and in turn being
enabled by the Holy Spirit to live the law. Not perfectly but much better.
|
The transformation comes from hearing the gospel of grace over and
over, and when the Holy Spirit confirms the fact that one has peace with God
based on the gospel of Christ’s cross, this in turn results in love for God
that translates to greater obedience to law principles out of love for God.
|
These presuppositions can all be reinforced by many scripture references. Further, it causes all of the conflict and contradictions to disappear.