The traditional doctrine of Original Sin, drawn most
heavily from Augustine’s reading of Genesis and Paul, tells us that humanity is
born guilty. Not merely flawed or ignorant—but culpable, condemned at birth,
bearing the guilt of Adam's disobedience. This is a radical claim. It tells
every newborn that they enter the world already alienated from God. It asserts
that God, in perfect justice, must punish sin and that every human being
deserves eternal torment apart from divine intervention.
But such a view raises deep ethical and theological
tensions. Can justice really be satisfied by punishing an innocent in place of
the guilty? Can a loving Creator truly require a blood sacrifice to appease
divine anger? Would this not reduce God to a cosmic executioner, bound by a
system of retribution more akin to pagan deities than the Abba whom Jesus
proclaimed?
In reimagining Christianity, we must step back and question
the very assumptions of this framework.
First, the notion of a “Fall” must be reassessed. In
the Genesis story, Adam and Eve do not fall from perfection into depravity.
They awaken prematurely to knowledge without maturity. Their “sin” is not so
much rebellion as it is an act driven by desire, curiosity, and the manipulation
of fear. It is a mythic portrayal of the human journey—our movement into
self-awareness, into the illusion of separation. The serpent promises they will
be like God, forgetting they already are made in the divine image. The tragedy
of Eden is not disobedience but forgetfulness. They forget their
identity, and they hide in shame. And from that forgetfulness emerges a world
of fear, domination, and suffering.
This interpretation aligns more closely with Gnostic
insights, particularly the Gospel of Truth, which reframes the human
problem not as sin inherited from Adam but as ignorance—a forgetting of
our divine origin. Salvation, then, is not legal pardon but remembrance.
Christ comes not to settle a cosmic debt, but to awaken us from our slumber.
The cross is not the payment God demands but the revelation humanity needs. It
unveils the fullness of divine love and the emptiness of our egoic illusions.
The concept of Penal Substitution, popularized by
Anselm and later by Reformers like Calvin, proposes that God’s justice requires
punishment. Jesus steps in as the substitute, absorbing God’s wrath so that
believers may be forgiven. But this framework fractures the Trinity—God
punishes God to satisfy God? It suggests that forgiveness must be bought
through violence, and that divine justice is retributive, not restorative. But
Jesus himself taught us to forgive not seven times, but seventy times seven.
Are we to believe that the God who tells us to forgive without condition is
incapable of doing so Himself?
Moreover, the cross loses its power as a revelation of love
and becomes instead a divine necessity for appeasement. This transforms the
gospel from good news to cosmic horror. It also raises profound psychological
harm: many believers are left feeling unworthy, guilty, and terrified of
eternal punishment. They are taught to see themselves not as beloved children
awakening to their divine nature, but as worms in need of rescue from God
Himself. This is not transformation. It is trauma.
Reimagining Christianity requires that we let go of this
punitive scaffolding and recover a Christology of awakening. Jesus did
not come to die to satisfy wrath but to show us the depth of divine love—even
in the face of hatred, violence, and empire. He was not murdered by God but by
the religious and political systems of his day. And in his willing embrace of
the cross, he exposed those systems as false and powerless. His resurrection is
not the reversal of wrath, but the unveiling of the truth: that love is
stronger than death, and that the divine spark within us cannot be
extinguished.
In this view, the “problem” Jesus came to solve was not
divine offense, but human blindness. We had forgotten who we are, lost in fear
and shame, building worlds on illusion and power. Jesus, as the Logos, enters
into that darkness to restore sight. As the Gospel of Thomas says, “When
you know yourselves, then you will be known, and you will realize that you are
the children of the Living Father.” This is not blasphemy. This is the
gospel.
And what of grace? In the penal framework, grace is
unmerited favor granted after satisfaction has been made. But in the reimagined
gospel, grace is the truth of our being. It is the light that shines
whether we know it or not. It is the divine current flowing through us, not
because we are worthy, but because we are divine in origin. Grace is not
conditional. It is not limited to the elect. It is the natural expression of
the All, pouring itself out into creation, awaiting only our recognition.
To reimagine Christianity is not to reject Scripture, but to
read it again through the lens of Christ-consciousness. It is to see the cross
not as a demand for blood, but as the depth of divine solidarity. It is to see
sin not as guilt inherited, but as a veil of forgetfulness. And it is to
proclaim that redemption is not legal justification but awakening to truth—a
truth that was ours before the foundation of the world.
The traditional doctrines of Original Sin and Penal
Substitution may have once offered structure to a pre-modern world. But now
they hinder the unfolding of a more expansive, inclusive, and transformative
gospel. A gospel in which Jesus is not our replacement but our revealer. A
gospel that heals rather than condemns. A gospel in which fear is cast out, and
only love remains.
No comments:
Post a Comment