What was the point of
Paul writing Galatians? Was Augustin, Calvin and Luther right, or are the “New
Perspective on Paul” people closer to the truth? My conclusion is that the New
Perspective people are definitely not right but, neither are many of those who
have adopted the western view of Paul that was championed by Augustin and
Luther. The title of this series speaks of nuance, and it seems that nuance is
not something that evangelicals work well with. Especially those evangelicals
that believe the bumper sticker which reads… “God said it – I believe it – and that
settles it.”
The question that is
raised is this; is this really what God said? This is the place that nuance
comes into play. There is such a variety of evangelical doctrines that are
often mutually exclusive. That alone should give pause to the bumper sticker
crowd. With this in mind we will boldly move on into the discussion to identify
the small difference that makes a huge distinction. What am I specifically
speaking of here? The simple answer is the gospel.
Paul writes this in Galatians chapter one: Gal 1:6-9 “I marvel
that you are turning away so soon from Him who called you in the grace of
Christ, to a different gospel, (7) which is not another; but there are some who
trouble you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ. (8)
But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you
than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed. (9) As we have said before, so now I say
again, if anyone preaches any other gospel to you than what you have received,
let him be accursed.” What were these
different gospels?
In order to answer
this question one has to read through Galatians’ chapters one and two. It
becomes obvious in reading Galatians one and two that the different gospel
demanded works of the law for justification. Galatians 2:21 states the most
important factor in identifying the different and false gospel. It reads: Gal 2:21 “I do not set aside the grace of
God, for if righteousness comes through the law, then Christ died for nothing.”
The attribute that identified the true gospel was this. Righteousness *does
not* come through the law. That means that one is not made righteous or
declared righteous by adhering to the law.
This is precisely
why I am so confident that the gospel that is preached today by most
evangelicals is a different gospel. While it is true that many, if not most
would say that righteousness does not come through obedience to the law, their
actual practice negates that statement. This is where the small difference with
a huge distinction comes into play. Nuance is the key word that I would use to
explain this. It is my hope that this will help us embrace the actual gospel
that Paul states was revealed to him by Jesus Christ.
This is the point
where many are going to say the word antinomian with an accusatory tone. Hold
your horses and wait for this series to be completed. Understand this however; Righteousness
does not come through the law. We do not
receive righteousness by our obedience to the law. This is different than Old
Covenant righteousness, and that is why the New Perspective people are simply
off base. Deu 6:25 “Righteousness will be ours if we are careful
to follow every one of these commands before the LORD our God, as He has
commanded us.” Old Covenant righteousness was connected with obedience to
the commandments. Not so under the New Covenant and that is where nuance comes
into play. This is the source of the small difference with a huge distinction.
Hey Joe..
ReplyDeleteHave you considered what Paul wrote to the holy ones in Galatia as a response to those judaizers sent by James to destroy the freedom in Christ?
Hi Roger,
DeleteYou make the point that Luther originally made. I used to adhere to it but in my reading of the Greek NT Scriptures recently, I don't see James as a grace buzz kill as I once did :)
What I have come to understand is that the NT scriptures were written during a transition period from Judaism (Old Covenant) to The New Jerusalem (New Covenant. During that time there was a Jew/Gentile distinction. The temple was still standing, the believing Jews were Torah observant, awaiting the destruction of the temple and God adjudicating between the Old Covenant unbelievers and the New Civenant believers.
With that understanding James becomes very grace oriented with statements like "mercy triumphs over judgment" etc. Likewise, when James said be doers of the word and not hearers only he no doubt meant be doers of the gospel and not hearers only.
As I move along in this series, I hope to show that true transformation and therefore true righteousness and holiness are brought about by peace with God Rom 5:1. Peace, Shalom, becomes very important in my paradigm shift. Shalom has a much more wholistic meaning than absence of strife. It includes, health, prosperity, serenity, hope deep trust etc.
I must add that those who came from James were teaching an erroneous gospel to the Gentiles but I doubt that it was sanctioned by James. I think that the difference between James and Paul over justification was meant to only effect the Jewish believers prior to the destruction of the temple
Delete