Jesus Without Fences: You can have a high Christology and still embrace eclectic spirituality

For me, eclectic and syncretistic spirituality is not a rejection of Jesus—it is the most honest way I can remain faithful to him without shrinking either my mind or my soul. It is the only path that allows my lived experience, my intellectual integrity, and my spiritual intuition to stand together without pretending they do not see one another. By this stage of my life, especially as I look toward 2026 as a year of reflection, balance, and integration, I can no longer inhabit a faith that demands selective blindness. Eclecticism is not confusion; it is coherence earned through decades of questioning, wrestling, and lived experience. Syncretism, for me, is not dilution—it is depth. It is the recognition that truth does not fracture simply because it appears through different languages, cultures, or symbolic systems. If consciousness itself is the ground of reality, then wisdom will inevitably surface wherever consciousness reflects upon itself honestly. I am not assembling a spiritual collage for novelty’s sake; I am recognizing patterns that repeat across traditions because they arise from the same source.

This approach fits the Jesus narrative precisely because Jesus himself operated as an awakener, not a system-builder. His message was not about protecting doctrinal borders but about opening eyes, restoring dignity, and reorienting consciousness toward love. He spoke in paradox, poetry, symbol, and story—not creeds. He refused to collapse God into an institution or reduce holiness to compliance. When he spoke of the Kingdom, it was not a future reward for correct belief but a present reality breaking in when perception shifts. That is the heart of my spirituality: awakening from forgetfulness into remembrance. In that sense, Jesus stands comfortably alongside the Tao’s effortless flow, the Hermetic insight of correspondence, and the mystical intuition that reality is far more unified than our categories allow. None of these diminish him; they illuminate the role he actually played. Jesus did not come to replace all wisdom with himself; he came to embody it.

Eclectic spirituality allows me to honor both material existence and spiritual depth without declaring war on either. I no longer see spirit and matter as enemies locked in a cosmic tug-of-war. They are poles of the same continuum—different densities of one reality. This is why strict orthodoxy eventually became untenable for me. It demanded that I demonize curiosity, distrust experience, and fear mystery. Yet Jesus consistently moved toward the margins, toward complexity, toward those whose lives did not fit neatly into religious boxes. He healed bodies, not just souls. He affirmed the goodness of embodied life even while pointing beyond it. An eclectic framework allows me to hold incarnation seriously—not as a temporary test to escape, but as a meaningful arena where consciousness learns, loves, suffers, and grows. That, to me, is far more faithful to the Jesus story than any theology that treats the world as a disposable failure.

Syncretism also aligns with my understanding of grace—not as a transaction, but as an atmosphere. Grace is not something earned by correct doctrine; it is the unconditional ground that allows transformation to occur. When Paul spoke of rest, peace, and transformation flowing from mercy, he was not outlining a belief checklist; he was describing a shift in orientation. Eclectic spirituality keeps me rooted in that rest. It resists the anxiety that comes from trying to defend a single system as absolute. Instead, it allows trust—trust that truth is not fragile, that love does not require gatekeepers, and that God is not threatened by honest exploration. Jesus lived from that trust. He did not fear contamination from other ideas, cultures, or people. He trusted love to do its work.

At this stage of my journey, eclecticism is also an act of humility. It acknowledges that no single tradition, including Christianity, has exhausted the mystery it points toward. If the Whole is never fully knowable by the parts, then all theology is provisional. That does not make it meaningless; it makes it participatory. Knowing becomes a relationship, not a conquest. This resonates deeply with my sense that consciousness evolves through experience, through polarity, through exploration. Jesus did not offer final answers; he invited people into a way of seeing. “Follow me” was not an invitation to certainty but to transformation. Eclectic spirituality allows me to keep following without pretending I have arrived.

Finally, this path fits who I am becoming. As I move further into reflection rather than construction, integration rather than defense, I feel less need to argue and more need to understand. Eclectic and syncretistic spirituality gives me a framework spacious enough to hold paradox, grief, joy, mystery, and awe without forcing resolution. It allows Jesus to remain central—not as an idolized exception, but as a living pattern of awakened humanity. He becomes not the boundary of truth, but its clearest expression. For me, that is not drifting away from Christianity; it is moving closer to its mystical heart. It is choosing balance over dogma, love over fear, and awakening over allegiance. And at this point in my journey, I can say with integrity that no other path fits as completely, as honestly, or as faithfully as this one.

Don't miss out, be sure to follow this blog for the latest updates.